Journal of Forest Planning


Review Process

The Journal conducts a single-blind review process. Each manuscript is first handled by one of the editors, at which time it is evaluated for Journal suitability. Manuscripts considered to be suitable are then peer-reviewed by at least two anonymous expert referees selected by the editor.

The editorial board makes the final decision to accept, reject, or suggest revision to manuscripts based on its contribution in terms of original data and ideas as indicated by the results of reviews conducted by the referees.

Review Form

Download a Word file of editor's form

Download a Word file of reviewer's form

Reviewer Acknowledgements

The editors would like to thank the reviewers for their hard work and contributions to the Journal. The quality of the Journal depends on their invaluable time and effort.

Page Top